The European gas market entered February 2026 in what appeared to be a narrow band of stability, but beneath that surface lay a structurally tight system highly exposed to geopolitical shocks. By the end of the month, that fragility was fully exposed, triggering a rapid repricing of gas across Europe and fundamentally altering trading behavior.
At the start of February, benchmark TTF prices traded within a relatively contained €30–33/MWh range, briefly touching €36/MWh, supported by strong LNG inflows that offset seasonal demand and declining storage levels . Storage, however, had already fallen below 30%, signaling tightening fundamentals even before the geopolitical shock materialized. This combination—stable prices but deteriorating fundamentals—created a market highly sensitive to any disruption.
The turning point came on 28 February 2026, when conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran triggered an immediate and sharp reaction. Gas prices surged by roughly 20% within days, driven not by physical shortages but by expectations of supply disruption . The escalation quickly evolved into a structural supply shock as attacks on key infrastructure—including the South Pars gas field and LNG facilities in the Gulf—raised the risk of sustained supply interruptions.
The strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz amplified the impact. With approximately 20% of global LNG trade transiting the corridor, disruptions to tanker flows immediately tightened global supply conditions. Hundreds of LNG carriers were delayed, forcing European buyers into intensified competition with Asian markets. This shift marked a decisive transition from a demand-driven market to one dominated by supply security concerns.
By early March, the repricing had deepened significantly. European gas prices rose by more than 35% following infrastructure strikes, and in broader terms surged by up to 65% in the weeks after the conflict began . Crucially, this escalation was not driven by pipeline disruptions—those remain structurally reduced since the decline of Russian flows—but by LNG market tightening. Europe’s dependence on LNG has fundamentally changed the transmission mechanism of shocks, making it more sensitive to global maritime disruptions than to regional pipeline events.
For Southeast Europe, this dynamic carries specific implications. The region remains structurally dependent on imported gas, with limited domestic production and growing reliance on LNG via terminals in Greece and Croatia. As LNG cargoes became more contested, procurement costs rose, and forward curves steepened. Traders began pricing in a sustained risk premium, reflecting not only immediate supply concerns but the possibility of prolonged geopolitical instability.
Trading behavior shifted rapidly in response. Market participants moved from short-term optimization toward risk hedging, increasing forward purchases and securing optionality in LNG supply contracts. Volatility also increased sharply, with price movements driven as much by geopolitical developments as by traditional supply-demand fundamentals.
The February events highlight a critical structural evolution: gas markets are no longer primarily driven by seasonal demand cycles but by geopolitical risk and global LNG dynamics. Storage levels, while still important, now play a secondary role compared to supply security considerations. Even with inventories above critical thresholds, the perception of risk can drive substantial price movements.
At the same time, the role of gas in electricity markets remains significant. Despite the growth of renewables, gas-fired generation continues to act as a marginal price setter in many SEE markets. As gas prices rise, the impact feeds directly into power prices, particularly in systems with limited flexibility or high import dependence.
Looking ahead, the gas market is likely to remain structurally volatile. The introduction of a persistent geopolitical risk premium suggests that price stability in the €30–40/MWh range may be difficult to sustain. Instead, markets are increasingly characterized by rapid swings, driven by both physical disruptions and expectations of future supply constraints.
For traders, this environment demands a shift in strategy. Traditional models based on predictable seasonal patterns are giving way to approaches that emphasize geopolitical analysis, supply chain monitoring, and flexible contracting. The February shock serves as a clear reminder that in today’s gas market, security of supply has become the dominant pricing factor.
Elevated by virtu.energy